Sources

This page is generated from the same file the pages cite, so it cannot fall out of step with them. A source cannot appear at the foot of an article without appearing here, and it cannot be removed from the site without disappearing here too.

Each entry carries the date it was last read rather than the date it was published. That is the date that matters to you: it says when the claim it supports was last checked against the source, which is a different and more useful fact than when the source itself went up.

One thing this list does not contain is a salary dataset, and the omission is deliberate. We describe on the methodology page what we would need before publishing compensation figures, and why the widely quoted public numbers for this job title are not a usable substitute.

Reference

Works whose purpose is to record what a term means, with a public revision history and dated references of their own.

Employers, in their own words

Live job postings. The least filtered description of the work available, because the company writing it is committing to hire against it.

Market and industry analysis

Analyst and research work on how the role is being staffed. Useful and interested: each of these organisations has a position in the market it describes.

Practitioners

Accounts written by people doing or organising the work. Specific and partial, which is what makes them worth reading alongside the rest.

What we do with a source we cannot verify

We leave the claim out. This costs us pages that would otherwise rank, and the clearest example is compensation: a page of salary figures for this role would attract more traffic than anything else on the site, and we do not have data we would be willing to put our name to.

Where a source is interested in the outcome, we say so rather than laundering it. Several entries above are published by organisations with a commercial position in the market they are describing. That does not make them wrong, and it does mean they should be read as participants rather than as observers.

Questions people actually ask

Why show the date a source was read rather than published?

Because the reading date is what tells you when the claim it supports was last checked. A source published in 2024 and read yesterday supports a current statement; the same source read once in 2024 and never revisited supports a statement nobody has verified since. Publication dates are available on the sources themselves.

What happens when a source disappears?

The claim goes with it. If a page we relied on is taken down or changed beyond recognition, we either find another source for the statement or remove the statement. Leaving an assertion standing on a dead link is how a site ends up asserting things nobody can check.

Do you cite sources that have a commercial interest?

Yes, and the list says so rather than presenting them as neutral. Several entries are published by organisations with a position in the market they describe. That does not make them wrong, and it means they should be read as participants. Marking it is more useful than excluding them.

Radif Partners

Written and maintained by Radif Partners

Applied AI deployment practice · Forward deployed engineering

Covers 2026, · last reviewed 2026-09-24